<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>corprewland &#187; apple</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.corprew.org/blog/tag/apple/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.corprew.org</link>
	<description>(dis)information organization</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 04 Feb 2010 20:48:34 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Aperture (Science), now from Apple</title>
		<link>http://www.corprew.org/blog/2008/03/11/aperture-science-now-from-apple/</link>
		<comments>http://www.corprew.org/blog/2008/03/11/aperture-science-now-from-apple/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 12 Mar 2008 01:11:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>corprew</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[general]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[aperture]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[aperture science]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[apple]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[enrichment center]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[glados]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[humor]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[portal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[text-to-speech]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.corprew.org/blog/2008/03/11/aperture-science-now-from-apple/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Tidbits, the apple weekly newsletter, missed the joke in their review of Apple Aperture 2.0.1. In your review of Aperture 2.0.1, you note: (Incidentally, the two videos on that page use Apple&#8217;s Victoria text-to-speech voice for the narration instead of a human voiceover, a practice I&#8217;ve not noticed before. It took a few seconds to [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Tidbits, the apple weekly newsletter, missed the joke in <a href="http://db.tidbits.com/article/9491">their review</a> of <a href="http://www.apple.com/applescript/aperture/indesign/">Apple Aperture 2.0.1</a>.</p>
<blockquote><p>In your review of Aperture 2.0.1, you note:</p>
<p>(Incidentally, the two videos on that page use Apple&#8217;s Victoria text-to-speech voice for the narration instead of a human voiceover, a practice I&#8217;ve not noticed before. It took a few seconds to pick out what was &#8220;wrong&#8221; &#8211; the occasional clipped words and odd pronunciations that indicated an artificial voice.)</p>
<p>This is a reference to the computer game Portal, the main antagonist in that game is a computer named GlaDOS, who has a voice somewhat similar to the victoria voice and that&#8217;s also the reason that there are some grammatical irregularities in the dialogue as well.  (&#8220;Aperture [Noun]&#8220;, which is said several times alludes to how the computer in that game says &#8220;Aperture Science,&#8221; the name of the company.)</p>
<p><a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TluRVBhmf8w">http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TluRVBhmf8w</a><br />
<a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=j0PDGp1hL4w">http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=j0PDGp1hL4w</a></p>
<p>Thanks,</p>
<p>&#8211;Corprew</p></blockquote>
<p>Not relevant to anything in particular, but funny.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.corprew.org/blog/2008/03/11/aperture-science-now-from-apple/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
