Comments on: being liberal in what you accept — implementation interoperability semantics http://www.corprew.org/blog/2008/04/04/being-liberal-in-what-you-accept-implementation-interoperability-semantics/ (dis)information organization Fri, 21 Nov 2008 03:03:50 +0000 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.3.3 By: corprew http://www.corprew.org/blog/2008/04/04/being-liberal-in-what-you-accept-implementation-interoperability-semantics/#comment-17305 corprew Fri, 04 Apr 2008 20:29:22 +0000 http://www.corprew.org/blog/2008/04/04/being-liberal-in-what-you-accept-implementation-interoperability-semantics/#comment-17305 Thanks dafydd, that's what I get for writing without my glasses on :-) Thanks dafydd, that’s what I get for writing without my glasses on :-)

]]> By: dafydd http://www.corprew.org/blog/2008/04/04/being-liberal-in-what-you-accept-implementation-interoperability-semantics/#comment-17304 dafydd Fri, 04 Apr 2008 20:16:56 +0000 http://www.corprew.org/blog/2008/04/04/being-liberal-in-what-you-accept-implementation-interoperability-semantics/#comment-17304 You left a fragmentary sentence. <blockquote>This was a case where the apache implementation wasn’t interoperating with the Microsoft implementation because the MSFT implementation.</blockquote> dafydd You left a fragmentary sentence.

This was a case where the apache implementation wasn’t interoperating with the Microsoft implementation because the MSFT implementation.

dafydd

]]>